Comparison Breakdown
Durability
Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen).
In terms of screen protection performance, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
Visual Quality
In terms of visual quality performance, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~294 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen), highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.
In the realm of display panel technology, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen).
From the screen refresh rate features, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
Connectivity Features
Comparing Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) that which is only features by 3G network connectivity, to the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 that already equipped with 4G capabilities, highlights a significant performance difference, with the latter inherently faster than Motorola Moto G (3rd gen). The inclusion of 4G technology in the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 positions it as a more advanced and future proof device, offering users faster data speeds and improved connectivity in the swiftly evolving landscape of network technologies. In contrast, the limited 3G network support in Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) may result in comparatively slower data transfer rates. Consequently the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing swift and efficient mobile connectivity experiences over the limitations of Motorola Moto G (3rd gen).
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 4 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 nor Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 equipped with Bluetooth 3.0, while the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) comes with more latest Bluetooth 4.0 technology. In this scenario, Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 4.0 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 4.0 in the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3.
Unfortunately, both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.
RAM & Storage
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 offers a RAM configuration of 1GB, while the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) boasts a more substantial 1GB / 2GB RAM range. Clearly, the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 offers internal storage options ranging from 8GB, while Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) surpasses this with an impressive 8GB / 16GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Motorola Moto G (3rd gen), allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Differing from the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3, the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Gaming Experience
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Mediatek MT6582 processor coupled with the Mali-400 MP2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.
Next, Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 processor and Adreno 306. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 and Adreno 306 allows the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) remains a viable and cost effective option.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 comes with less RAM than Motorola Moto G (3rd gen). Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) holds an advantage over the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen), as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 5.0" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen), making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
Camera Features
When it comes to the main camera features, both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) share a common ground, utilizing a Single Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 13 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
When discussing front camera features, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 outshines the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen), boasting a significantly higher 8 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen). In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.
Sadly, the both of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Battery Endurance
Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 falls short in comparison to the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen). The Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 is equipped with a 1900 mAh battery, whereas the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) boasts a more substantial 2470 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.
Talking on fast charging capabilities, the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and the Motorola Moto G (3rd gen), eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.
Security Features
Unfortunately, both the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 and Motorola Moto G (3rd gen) lack dedicated biometric sensors for enhanced security. The overall tie in their performance highlights a shared limitation. The absence of a distinct advantage in terms of biometric security features suggests that, in the contemporary era where security is paramount, the lack of advancements in this aspect may be considered a drawback. In a landscape where technological innovations continually shape user experiences, the absence of distinctiveness in dedicated security sensors on both devices might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide users with a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.
